sábado, 14 de diciembre de 2024

Broken Melodies and Deep Grooves: Listening at the Limits of Cuban Music in Miami


Broken Melodies and Deep Grooves.

By Celeste Frazer Delgado

Such is the case in an ongoing series of albums released by Miami-based composer and violinist Alfredo Triff and a shifting roster of collaborators, including vocalists Roberto Poveda, Laugart, and Nuviola. From Twenty-One Broken Melodies, All at Once (2001) to Miami Untitled (2013), Triff and his ensemble dismantle all that is “customary” in the bolero and reform the “tissue of cultural values” that makes up Cuban love songs. A violinist trained at the National Conservatory of Music in Havana from age seven and later at Cuba’s Superior Institute of Arts, Triff left Cuba during the Mariel boatlift in 1980 and made his living playing with a number of traditional Cuban dance bands in New York City. He also collaborated on more experimental projects with jazz impresario Kip Hanrahan, who produced Twenty-One Broken Melodies for release on his American Clave label. 

Every instrument on Twenty-One Broken Melodies can be said to have “grain”: limbs palpable in the bowing of strings, hands slapping congas, lips pursed on the saxophone. As the title suggests, the album breaks Cuban melodies into fragments, which, in fact, play consecutively. On the opening track, “Skies North,” Triff’s poignant, sustained bowing sounds like accompaniment stripped from some unheard song. Conga interludes throughout the album play like solos unmoored from dance numbers. On “La Sitiera” (“The Farm Wife”), the shiver and pluck of Triff’s violin competes with the deep-throated vocals of New York–based, Afro- Cuban singer Laugart as she sings a farmer’s plea for his wife’s return. But the wife will not return, Triff’s arrangement suggests, and these fragments of melodies will never knit together again. 

In the mid-1990s, Triff moved to Miami, where he established himself as a subtropical Renaissance man, serving for several years as the art critic for the Miami New Times; earning a doctorate in philosophy at the University of Miami and joining the faculty at Miami Dade College; and hosting tumiamiblog.com, where more than eighty contributors engage in a lively forum on Miami arts, politics, and intellectual life, which, of course, extends to Cuba and the Cuban diaspora. Since his move, the philosopher’s music has grown increasingly concerned with Miami as a generative site. 

The cover of Triff’s second album, Boleros perdidos (Lost Boleros; 2006), features a photograph of the Interstate 95 overpass above SW Eighth Street, Little Havana’s main thoroughfare. Boleros perdidos began as a live performance in April 2002 at Subtrop- ics, Miami’s annual experimental music and sound art festival, and expanded in May of that year into a monthlong series of concerts at Hoy Como Ayer. A song cycle after the tradition of European art song, where a composer sets a series of poems to music, usually for one singer, Boleros perdidos was composed for Roberto Poveda, a Cuban singer-songwriter who came to Miami via Colombia in the 1990s. The grain of the voice is palpable in Poveda’s impressive repertoire of rasp: from a nearly clear voice with a tickle in the throat to an intimate whisper to a whisky-soaked confession, to exhaling smoke or gulping for air. 

These lost boleros are, in fact, the unmaking of the bolero. Poveda’s persona agonizes over the memory of a woman lost. At times, he forgets her as he goes about his business (“Olvido” [“Forgetting”]); other times, he feels he is losing his mind (“Delirio” [“Delirium”]); alone, late at night, he sings to her (“Miami 3:00 a.m.”). At times, female vocalists Laugart or Nuviola double his voice, like an unshakable memory. Or they sing solo, warning the lover, “Duda tus certezas sobre mi” (“Di mi nombre” [“Say My Name”]) and reminding him that words say nothing: “La palabra no dice” (“Palabra” [“Word”]). In the last track, on what promises to be just another night, he believes that she has returned at last, only to force him to confess his own delusions: “Cómo puede ser que no existas?” (“Otra noche” [“Another Night”]). 

On Triff’s next album, Dadason (2009), the dismantling of popular Cuban dance music heralds new possibilities as the Alfredo Triff Trio simultaneously plays and unplays Cuban son. On the title track, the violin issues an invitation to dance that is rescinded by bebop sax and dirgelike bass. On “Dadaochun,” a mournful classical violin questions the conga’s worship of the Afro-Cuban deity of sensuality. On “La balsa de Duchamp” (“Duchamp’s Raft”), the conga evokes Yemaya, the deity of the ocean, while the violin, bass, and sax stutter and spit, never coalescing into a coherent groove. 

Having thoroughly deconstructed the bolero and the son, twin pillars of the popular Cuban musical tradition, Triff’s Miami Untitled (2013) shifts the terrain definitely to Miami. Though the song’s lyrics remain in Spanish, the titles are now in English. The instrumental interludes, untitled on earlier albums, now map South Florida geography: “Everglades Eventides,” “I-95 North,” “Key West’s Last Light of Day,” “Cutler Glides Like the Water into Sparkle,” and “South Beach Shootout” (a delightful duel between two tenor saxophones). Also in English, the CD jacket promises, “A love story from a sunny land of vice, broken dreams and obstinate exiles.” In this love story, Triff claims most of the vocals for himself, sometimes joined by his wife, poet,  and actor Rosie Inguanzo, often in a spoken-word style. Yet Poveda and Laugart return on key tracks. The album centerpiece, “Abusé (If You Only Knew How Much I Lied to You),” features Poveda in an extended confession of his infidelity over a lively Cuban son-jazz, punctuated again by Triff’s shivering violin. 

A video for “Abusé,” directed by Luis Soler, debuted at Hoy Como Ayer in July 2014, along with live performance by Triff and his collaborators of songs from his entire discography. Soler’s video draws from surrealist conventions of juxtaposition, most notably using the slicing of pig flesh to suggest a gruesome punishment for the singer’s infidelities. But in a reversal of the singer’s admission of philandering as macho privilege, the video shows Triff himself as cuckold, his wife Inguanzo acting the part of philanderer, while her husband sits beside the bed, stirring his whiskey in resignation. Over an insistent saxophone and conga riff, Inguanzo listens to a confession by Triff/Poveda, whose images are interchanged throughout the conversation. The woman insists that the man/ men clarify what abusive acts he/they has/have committed. As the music swells, then stops, she laughs at his vague transgressions: “Tu conciencia está maltrecha.” After a half-century of mutual accusations, forced confessions, and renunciations, laughter defeats the assignation of guilt. The litany of who abused whom is lost in a confusing swirl of shifting images.

viernes, 7 de junio de 2024

How Hernan Bas pokes fun at conceptualism

Conceptual artist #20, (performance-based acting as his own receiver, he's seeking a signal from the airwaves for over a decade), 2023.

alFredoTriFf


Hernan Bas's show, The Conceptualists at the Bass Museum of Art, is an exciting spectacle.
  
Conceptual art

Conceptual Art refers to various artistic practices from the late 1960s to the early 1970s, emphasizing the concept (or idea) instead of the physical art object. Since conceptual artists are considered art theorists, we need to unpack the theory.  
A reference theory of meaning ... claims that the meaning of a word or expression lies in what it points out in the world. 

However, for this reference to become art, we need this "pointing out" to become aesthetic. Then, one can say: 

Art is the concept behind it. 

This is shown here in a rather direct and crude manner (chair, photo of the chair, and explanation appear as a whole). Let's call this a first-order reference. 

"Chair" (the thing + the thing's photo + the explanation) is the art/concept.



Conceptual art comes in different flavors. Bas uses a second-order reference flavor. He presents the art/concept (first-order reference) and subverts it by folding it.  

How? Make it bounce onto itself. 
 
The folding

In The Conceptualists, the protagonist and his alter ego undergo a series of "conceptual tasks," which appear banal and purposeless. According to plan, this conceptual maneuver loops onto itself, pointing to its ultimate world referent: the artist, Bas himself.  

The folding happens via the painting's title. 


Above, you see a painting minus its title. Boxing is reduced to pillow fighting. The reference to the world is already there. But without the title, there's no reference folded back onto itself. 

We need some context. 

Czech theorist Jan Mukařovský has an interesting thesis. What we take as "banal" remains a suspect choice precisely because of its preassumed hierarchy. Mukařovský counsels looking at neglected things differently, that is, as (potential) redeeming notes, legitimate subjects of aesthetic investigation. 

Use these glasses to look at Bas' show. 

Conceptual artist #36 (his site-specific wall drawings are created after a night's sleep in purportedly haunted locations), 2023

Let's take the painting above. The artist breaks from working on a crayon drawing on the wall (a bit of trompe l'oeil adds a certain je ne sais quoi). For now, observe how title and painting do not necessarily coalesce. They perform a conceptual dance. 

It's daytime (the semi-opened window proves it). The artist sits, hands dirty, on a disheveled bed. The reddish drawings are glued to the wall underneath the superimposition of the crayon drawing. He looks outside the painting (the painter? or the observer?). Nah. He's self-absorbed. 

According to the title, does he just have this thing of doing site-specific art in purportedly haunted locations? Weird. 

Keep in mind Mukarovsky (things are not what they seem). 

Radical distancing

Here comes Ortega Gasset's lesson in The Dehumanization of Art:

The creators of new art give their works a dehumanized aesthetic by radically distancing themselves from the "lived" reality ... their daily existence (objects, spaces, living beings, inorganic beings): it is this radical distance in the gaze that allows them to make the leap from the "lived" reality to the "contemplated" reality.

What's the radical distance

In phenomenology, "distance" means a lack of presence. From the perspective of conceptual art, one could retort that a lack of presence presupposes presence. Using Ortega's favorite metaphor, missing the trees from the forest presupposes the former. 

The retort from conceptual art: what if presence is absent? One can see a tree and yet miss it altogether. 
We need conceptual glasses. 

Conceptual art comes in different flavors.  

Conceptual artist #18 (spirited for urban legends, he fabricates roadside memorials from which to hitchhike), 2023

Bas's painting title (above) suggests the hitchhiker standing at a "fabricated" memorial. Is this young man really hitchhiking or—judging his demeanor—"posing," as it were? It looks too perfect: the trees, the clean, well-paved, sinuous road—is it really raining? 

The more one looks, the more open-ended everything seems. This conceptual maneuver is richer (and more fun) than Kosuth's late 1960s modus operandi. Bas' maneuver is so sleek and slippery that, in the end, one (after much cerebration) accepts the insoluble dissonance of conceptual back and forth. 

Conceptual artist #24, (his multidisciplinary works are cultivated from the periodic table), 2023

Doesn't Conceptual artist #24 folded-on-self mise-en-scène seem obvious? 

The artist's (Bas') empty performance fulfills itself by automatically emptying itselfwhat Ortega calls dehumanized, "contemplated" reality. 

His conceptual artist #28 recalls a passage from Fin de siecle French in literature and sensibility, 

Falling for the conceptual trap 😂

Someone by the name of Douglas Markowitz covered the show for The Miami New Times

Here's a paragraph: 

Every piece in "The Conceptualists" engages in the melodramatic yet ridiculously unserious artistic discipline that one usually sees in parodies of the art world like The Square or Velvet Buzzsaw. They all look somewhat alike, all possessing the same slim, androgynous build and gaunt complexion that has become a hallmark of Bas' paintings. Obvious craftsmanship and attention to detail aside, the series presents something rare in contemporary art: classically inclined, representational work meant to be purely funny.  

Let's see: 

1. Every piece?  

2. Melodramatic yet ridiculously unserious artistic discipline. 

3. Classically inclined, representational work meant to be purely funny.

Markowitz, leaving these puerile reductive concoctions aside, what are you talking about? 

Conceptual artist #21 (his formative work, "Prom Night," marked the beginning of a career of works based on acts of disappointment), 2023

Doing the dirty work

Here's a photo of Bas in his studio (via The New Times). It looks like he's actually "doing" the dirty work of painting faces, hands, flowers, balloons, etc. Not outsourcing it! 


Bas's art has grown technically and conceptually. He is not in 1894, amidst the apotheosis of nineteenth-century l'art pour l'art (Oscar Wilde still walking down Tite Street in Chelsea, sane and free). Stoically (decadents are stoic),  he adapts to our dull postmodern reality. 

The themes of the early 2000s reappear, but Bas' self-referential mal du Siecle appears filtered by a skillful—if florid at times—self-parody. His alter ego is now protean, witty, and less obviously effeminate.

Titling

Conceptual artist #3 (chewing gum every working hour of the day, he considers "Bubblegum Alley" his archive)

Lastly, Bas' paintings would not work without his titling style. Take the painting above as an example: We see the artist blowing up a bubblegum ball and walls collaged with bubblegum. The title describes what the artist does and then reveals his objective—an over-the-top plan that throws off the balance between signified and signifier.

(this last painting is Bas's smorgasboard)  

👇



martes, 19 de marzo de 2024

¿Qué significa ser un insecto?


alFredoTriFf

"Eres un insecto" es una diatriba. Entomón: algo cortado en pedazos, parte artrópodo, ente rápido, sinuoso o volador, o anfibio, alimaña. La selección natural los ha multiplicado y son imprescindibles para el género de los vertebrados y por consiguiente para el balance del ecosistema. aunque nuestra existencia depende de ellos los consideramos como intrusos.

¿Cómo imaginar un insecto? ¿Cuál es su ser?

Sartre separa el l'être pour soi exclusivamente para el ser humano. El l'être en soi (ser-en-sí) es designado como sans nuance, para la cosa. 

¿Y los animales y las plantas? 

Heidegger repasa tres órdenes en los conceptos fundamentales de la metafísica: el humano o dasein,  formador-de-mundos (weltbildend), la cosa queda sin-mundo (weltlos) y el reino animal y vegetal relegados a pobre-en-mundo (weltarm).

La ontología occidental está permeada de un antropomorfismo acrítico, incluso indolente.

El primer obstáculo es que no somos insectos. 

Kafka exploró la metamorfosis de Gregor Samsa, pero el análisis kafkiano termina presentándonos una cucaracha humana:
Sintió sobre el vientre un leve picor, con la espalda se deslizó lentamente más cerca de la cabecera de la cama para poder levantar mejor la cabeza; se encontró con que la parte que le picaba estaba totalmente cubierta por unos pequeños puntos blancos, que no sabía a qué se debían, y quiso palpar esa parte con una pata, pero inmediatamente la retiró, porque el roce le producía escalofríos.
Debemos ir no "abajo" a la cucaracha, sino arriba, a lo abstracto que de común existe entre el insecto y el humano a nivel general del reino animal.

Clarice Lispector en La pasión según GH ofrece otra mirada:
La cucaracha con la materia blanca me miraba. No sé si me veía. No sé lo que ve una cucaracha. Pero ella y yo nos mirábamos y tampoco sé lo que una mujer ve.
Lispector admite que no sabe cómo mira el insecto, pero que tampoco sabe como mira una mujer. En cuanto a mirada se trata equipara ambas miradas, ambas enigmas. ¿Qué hay detrás de la mirada? Es un problema difícil de franquear.
Pero si sus ojos no me veían su existencia me existía - en el mundo primario donde yo había entrado, los seres existen a los otros como forma de verse. Y en ese mundo que yo estaba conociendo, hay varias formas que significan ver: uno mira al otro sin verlo, uno posee al otro, uno come al otro, uno está sólo en un rincón y el otro está allí también: todo eso también significa ver. La cucaracha no me miraba con los ojos sino con el cuerpo.
En efecto, los ojos de la cucaracha pueden ver 360º a la redonda y contienen cerca de 2,000 lentes lo que les permite ver muchas cosas a la vez. Del mismo modo no podemos leer la mente de otro ser humano, solo su comportamiento. 

La conclusión de que la cucaracha ve con el cuerpo es atrevidamente fenomenológica. La mirada puede tocar las cosas. Lispector no tiene cuita de rechazar el insecto y examinar su propio rechazo. Así deja atrás "siglos y siglos en el lodo".
Lo que yo veía era la vida mirándome. Cómo llamar de otro modo a aquello horrible y crudo, materia prima y plasma seco, que estaba allí, mientras yo retrocedía hacia dentro de mí en naúsea seca, yo cayendo siglos y siglos en el lodo -era lodo y ni siquiera lodo ya seco sino lodo aún húmedo y aún vivo, era un lodo donde se movían con lentitud insoportable las raíces de mi identidad.
con todo el ejercicio lispectoriano está lleno de obstáculos (incluso en esa difícil heterología que emmanuel levinas plantea en la cara del ser humano en tu totalidad e infinito). y surge la pregunta:

¿Tiene cara una cucaracha?

La cara levinasiana no puede ser solo identidad. de serlo el acercamiento al otro que defiende el filósofo francés no sería más que un narcicismo solapado. por ello derrida criticaba esa idea ética de totalidad en levinas (en su ensayo violencia y metafísica):
Hay que tener cuidado con esto: este tema de la tautología concreta (no-formal) o de la falsa heterología (finita), este tema difícil se propone bastante discretamente al comienzo de Totalidad e infinito ... Si la negatividad (trabajo, historia, etc.) no contiene jamás relación con lo otro, si lo otro no es la simple negación de lo mismo, entonces ni la separación ni la trascendencia metafísica se piensan bajo la categoría de la negatividad.
Aquí llega la conclusión: 
De la misma manera que -lo veíamos más arriba- la simple consciencia interna no podría, sin la irrupción de lo totalmente otro, darse el tiempo y la alteridad absoluta de los instantes, así también el yo no puede engendrar en sí la alteridad sin el encuentro del otro.
Es decir, el horizonte heterológico nos está limitado estructuralmente. Nunca puedo ser (absolutamente) otro.

Lo que no inplica que no pueda serlo bastante.